UUIDs in Databases
UUIDs are widely used as database primary keys and identifiers in modern applications. They are particularly useful when records need to be created across multiple servers, services, or databases without relying on a central sequence. A UUID can be generated independently before a record is inserted, making it useful for distributed systems, APIs, microservices, replication, and data synchronization.
Using UUIDs as database keys also comes with tradeoffs. UUIDs are larger than integers and can require more storage in tables and indexes. Random UUID v4 values can also reduce index locality because new values are distributed throughout the index rather than inserted in a predictable order. For large databases, this can affect index size, page splits, fragmentation, and write performance. UUID v7 addresses some of these concerns by incorporating a timestamp while retaining a large random component, producing identifiers that are roughly time-ordered.
Choosing between a UUID and an integer or bigint primary key depends on the application architecture and database workload. Integer keys are compact, efficient, and naturally ordered, while UUIDs can be generated independently and remain unique across different systems. UUIDs can therefore be especially useful for distributed applications, data imports, replication, and systems where identifiers need to be created before reaching the database. There is no universally correct choice; the database's indexing behavior, expected scale, and application requirements all matter.
The right UUID database strategy also depends on the database engine, storage format, and indexing strategy. PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQL Server, Oracle, SQLite, and NoSQL databases have different UUID data types, functions, storage options, and indexing behavior. Storing UUIDs in an appropriate native or binary representation can also reduce storage requirements compared with storing them as 36-character text values.
The articles below cover the practical aspects of using UUIDs in databases, including UUID primary keys, UUID v4 and UUID v7, database performance, index bloat, storage requirements, indexing, and database-specific implementation details.
Related Articles
Latest
Choosing Between UUIDs and Other Key Strategies
- UUIDv4 vs UUIDv7 for Database Primary Keys: A Practical Comparison
- UUID as Primary Key: The Complete Storage & Indexing Tradeoffs Guide
- Composite Keys vs UUIDs: When Natural Keys Beat Surrogate UUIDs
- UUID Index Bloat Explained: B-Trees, Page Splits, and What to Do About It
- How Much Storage Do UUID Primary Keys Actually Cost at Scale? (Real Numbers)
UUIDs in PostgreSQL
- UUID vs BIGSERIAL as Primary Key in PostgreSQL: Which Should You Use?
- How to Store UUIDs Correctly in PostgreSQL (uuid type vs text vs varchar(36))
- Enabling gen_random_uuid() in Postgres: pgcrypto vs uuid-ossp vs Native (PG13+)
- UUID v7 in PostgreSQL: Native Support, Extensions, and Benchmarks
UUIDs in MySQL
- Storing UUIDs Efficiently in MySQL: BINARY(16) vs CHAR(36)
- UUID() vs AUTO_INCREMENT in MySQL: Performance Benchmarks
- MySQL UUID Functions Explained (UUID_TO_BIN, BIN_TO_UUID, is_swapped)
UUIDs in NoSQL Databases
Related Tools and Guides
Need some UUIDs for testing? Try our tools for generating
UUID v4
UUID v7
ULID
NanoID
and
decoding
validating.
For a detailed comparison of UUID versions, visit our Complete Guide to UUID Versions.